Harley-Davidson Low Rider S vs. Indian Sport Chief

Has Indian built a better performance cruiser than Harley-Davidson?

By Bradley Adams | www.cycleworld.com

The only guarantees in life are death, taxes, and a rivalry between Harley-Davidson and Indian. The latest matchup pits H-D’s Low Rider S against Indian’s Sport Chief.Jeff Allen

If you wondered where the inspiration for the modern performance cruiser came from, take a look in the mirror. OK, maybe the inspiration didn’t come from you specifically, but bikes like the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S and Indian Sport Chief weren’t born by chance. They exist because an overwhelming majority of riders proved there was a market for tall, West Coast–style performance cruisers. And because there’s nothing more American than stuffing a big V-twin in a cruiser chassis with sporty suspension. Style with a heap of performance on top? Yes, please.

Harley-Davidson was the first to capitalize on the custom, West Coast trend, primarily because its legion of loyal fans had built the trend on The Motor Company’s bikes, specifically on the FX (Factory Experimental) with roots going back to the 1971 Super Glide.

Leading up to 2016, H-D design knew the twin-shock Dyna’s days were numbered and launched the Low Rider S. But even if that bike captured what customers had been doing with dual-shock, rubber-mount Big Twins for decades, Harley-Davidson was consolidating its heavy cruiser line into one platform and Dynas exited stage left in 2017. The overhauled Softail lineup followed in 2018, and many tears were shed over tall black socks and Vans Old Skool shoes by the faithful. Fortunately, the Low Rider S was reintroduced as a Softail and with a Milwaukee-Eight 114 engine in 2020, before being outfitted with a Milwaukee-Eight 117 in 2022.

The Dyna Low Rider S’ dual shocks are missed on the Softail-based Low Rider S, but it’s hard to argue with the ride quality and handling of a modern Softail chassis.Jeff Allen

The Sport Chief’s history isn’t nearly as convoluted. After letting its Chief platform sit relatively unchanged since 2014, Indian fundamentally overhauled its cruiser lineup in 2022 with more stripped-down, visually lighter bikes like the Chief, Chief Bobber, and Super Chief. Number of non-bagger models with swoopy Indian-traditional full fenders? Precisely zero. The new Chief cruisers are great bikes that markedly improved performance and finally offered more easily customized steel frames (in place of aluminum). The only thing missing from the line was a performance cruiser with West Coast style, and just a year later Indian filled that void with the Sport Chief.

With two legitimate, American-made performance cruisers now available, the question is, who builds a better West Coast–style performance motorcycle? The answer, we assumed, lies somewhere on the California coast and in the mountains that spawned this cruiser subculture. Turns out, that answer isn’t as easy to find as you might expect.

The 2022 overhaul of the Indian Chief lineup resulted in a more stripped-down, visually lighter appearance for its cruisers. The Sport Chief adds to that with polished finishes and proper West Coast–style features. The added space between engine and frame pulls your attention to that big V-twin. Emphasis on big.Jeff Allen

A Closer Look at the Bikes

Scour the internet for a definition of West Coast club styling and you’ll come up surprisingly empty-handed. That doesn’t mean there’s not an unwritten blueprint behind “tall-bike” West Coast builds, most of which include some combination of aggressive ergonomics, a small front fairing, tall-back seat, and performance upgrades for engine, chassis, and brakes. There isn’t a formula, but there’s definitely a formula…

That’s only important to know because it explains the similarities between the bikes splayed across your screen. The Low Rider S, for example, expands on Harley’s Softail Standard platform through the addition of that Milwaukee-Eight 117 engine (versus a Milwaukee-Eight 107), a sportier inverted fork with triple-rate springs (versus conventional fork with dual-rate springs), more aggressive geometry, and a taller, more performance-oriented shock. Cornering clearance increases 2.8 degrees.

Styling is important on a performance cruiser. And although the Low Rider S is a great canvas for customization, the Sport Chief looks like a custom build right off the dealer floor.Jeff Allen

West Coast styling here means you get 4-inch bar risers paired to a moto-style handlebar, Speed Screen fairing, high-back solo seat, and virtually no chrome. The jury is still out on the all-black wrinkle paint that hard parts are doused in (only because our own staffers argue about liking it or not), but we’re fans of the bar-mount display that replaced the tank-mounted cluster on previous-gen models. The heavy-breather intake and color treatments on the Low Rider S are nice touches too—subtle reminders that this scene is just as much about style as it is performance.

If you are not a fan of the Low Rider S for any reason, then turn your attention back to the Indian, which has a slightly more luxurious and less industrial appearance. Black is still very much the color of choice, but gloss paint and machined finishes on the bar risers and top triple clamp give the Sport Chief a higher-quality look from the saddle. Same goes for the full-featured, 4-inch touchscreen display that feels like the right display to have on a $20,000 bike.

The Low Rider S is a combination of highly polished and industrial finishes. The Milwaukee-Eight 117’s heavy-breather intake adds to performance-focused undertones, while the display and liberal use of wrinkle paint are less appealing (to most). The speed fairing and tall-back seat fit the West Coast theme, though the seat cushion is too soft for long-distance comfort. The seat cover is not as nice as what you’ll find on the Indian, either.Jeff Allen

Supplementary hardware matches what you’d expect to find on a West Coast–style build: Six-inch bar risers are mated to a moto-style handlebar. There’s a quarter fairing with small-but-effective 6.5-inch windscreen, plus KYB inverted fork, upgraded Brembo calipers, and larger, 320mm brake discs. Compare that to the conventional fork and single, 300mm brake disc setup on the base-model Chief.

The story is the same out back, where you’ll find a more supportive and stylish solo seat and Fox piggyback shocks. Power upgrades come in the form of Indian’s air-cooled Thunderstroke 116 engine, which offers more performance than the Chief’s Thunderstroke 111 and is very much the main attraction when you walk up to this bike. Remember what we said about Americans loving big V-twin engines stuffed in sporty chassis? Well this is a big engine—both in displacement and physical size.

The Sport Chief’s 4-gallon tank is a full gallon smaller than the Low Rider S’. The round, touchscreen display is nice in that it doesn’t look too modern or out of place, while still offering easy access to electronic rider aids and pertinent information, not to mention available navigation. The larger quarter-fairing cowl is Indian’s take on West Coast styling. Meanwhile, the seat offers more support than the Harley’s, while also being more visually appealing. This is a collection of very nice pieces.Jeff Allen

Even though it doesn’t present as “largely,” Harley-Davidson’s four-valve-per-cylinder oil/air-cooled Milwaukee-Eight still has an obvious performance advantage versus the two-valve-per-cylinder Indian. When strapped to our in-house dyno, the Low Rider S made 92.98 hp and 114.82 lb.–ft. of torque, whereas the Sport Chief could only manage 73.70 horsepower and 105.17 lb.-ft. of torque. This and a smoother power delivery also gave it the advantage in quarter-mile testing.

We have to give the sound award to the Sport Chief though, thanks to its deeper and more full exhaust note. We’ve talked often about H-D’s in-house sound chamber on these pages, and recognize how important that “cruiser sound” is to The Motor Company, so to have the Sport Chief be the better sounding bike is a nod to the lengths Indian has gone to not be “the other cruiser option.” Another nod goes to the Sport Chief’s electronics package, which includes three ride modes (Sport, Standard, Tour) and a rear cylinder deactivation system that keeps the air-cooled twin from blessing you with unwanted reminders of how hot your ride is. Both bikes come with cruise control, a USB port, and keyless ignition, though the Low Rider S also gets traction control—a curious omission on the Sport Chief.

Radially mounted Brembo calipers on the Sport Chief (right) should have a massive benefit over the traditionally mounted, lower-spec calipers on the Low Rider S (left), but there isn’t an obvious performance advantage on the road. At least not one in the Indian’s favor… Initial bite is extremely soft and the stopping power is adequate at best, whereas the Low Rider’s brakes have more feel through the lever travel, allowing you to brake harder and with more confidence.Jeff Allen

When Rubber Hits the Road

If when reading about the Sport Chief’s touchscreen display and ride modes you were thinking, “I don’t need any of that on a cruiser,” well, you might be right. Or at least in this case you might be absolutely right, because while the TFT display and modern touches look good on paper, the Sport Chief’s electronics caused more headaches than almost any other part of the bike. The dash takes suspiciously long to come to life, the ride-by-wire throttle is overly aggressive in Sport mode but rather dull in Standard, and every once in a while our testbike would crank endlessly without firing. Cycle the ignition, give the fuel pump more time to prime, and we were back in business. These are not things riders will easily overlook on a $20,000 motorcycle.

The Low Rider S is quite refined by comparison. We wouldn’t describe the touchpoints like the grips and switch gear as visually beautiful, but the throttle connection is seamless, the clutch has significantly more feedback throughout the lever pull, and the rigid-mount (but dual-counterbalanced) M-8 engine has just enough of a shake to capture the essence of riding a big V-twin cruiser. The Sport Chief is abrupt and vibrates enough that it feels as if it’s been forged from one big chunk of metal. Mind you, this raw and rowdy feel could very well be intentional on Indian’s part.

The Indian transfers a lot of vibration through the handlebar and footpegs at cruising speeds, which sacrifices some of the comfort provided by the supportive seat and open rider triangle.Jeff Allen

The Low Rider’s higher levels of refinement and “cleaner” tuning show through elsewhere, like in the M-8′s broad power curve. The Sport Chief’s Thunderstroke 116 is your typical heavyweight fighter, with haymaker hits in limited doses; blow through the meaty bottom-end and suddenly the two-valve engine runs out of breathing and power tapers off. The Low Rider S has a touch less grunt at very low rpm but has a healthier midrange, which makes it a more flexible engine. It’s punchy enough for around-town riding, smooth at highway speeds, and has a more free-revving top-end for when you want to pick up the pace. Which you should do—that upgraded suspension isn’t just for looks.

The Low Rider S is the more relaxed bike for around-town riding. The throttle connection is intuitive, the clutch offers more feel and a larger engagement point, and the engine is more flexible with a larger range of usable power. One downside is the slightly higher footpeg mounting position, which puts your knees at more of a bend. This rider is 6 feet, 3 inches.Jeff Allen

When the Cruising Ends

Our biggest day on these bikes consisted of a cruise on Pacific Coast Highway, followed by lunch at Neptune’s Net (many a Dyna have wheelied by here) and what seemed like a never-ending afternoon tearing through the Santa Monica mountains. We’d be lying if we told you that either has sportbike-like performance. But each bike pushes the limit of what a showroom-stock big-twin cruiser is capable of and they turn out to be wicked fun on smooth sections of flowing canyon road.

The nod goes to the Low Rider S, however, thanks to its slightly lighter weight (678 pounds versus 687 pounds) and increased willingness to go from one side of the tire to the other as you muscle the bikes through nature’s chicanes. The Low Rider S has a narrower front tire (110 versus 130), which influences steering feel and response in this way. An added benefit is that the Low Rider has 1.8 degrees more cornering clearance, which meant less custom footpeg reshaping over the course of our canyon rides. Don’t get us wrong, there’s still a lot of footpeg grinding on both bikes.

The Sport Chief’s footpegs are constantly being reshaped when riding through the canyons, thanks to the bike’s 29.5 degrees of cornering clearance (versus 31.3 degrees for the Low Rider S). These are tall(er) bikes, yes, but still suffer from frequent footpeg grinding.Jeff Allen

Other performance upgrades on the Sport Chief are a combination of hit and miss. Stiffer suspension sends the occasional shock down your spine on rough roads, but allows you to be more aggressive with your inputs in the canyons. The stiffness makes the ride experience more dynamic and engaging, even if a little exhausting over time. Everything you do on the Sport Chief is etched in your memory because of the sounds and vibrations and aggressiveness to it. The Low Rider just sort of exists in your memory of the ride, because of its smoothness and the way it quietly goes about its business.

Another example is the brakes. Theoretically, the Sport Chief’s radially mounted Brembo calipers should offer massively improved stopping power over the Low Rider’s lower-spec setup. Imagine our surprise then when we preferred the Low Rider’s braking package for the more fluid stopping power and increased feel at the lever. Sometimes things can be less than the sum of their parts.

There are still wins though: The Sport Chief is more comfortable for a wider range of riders. Both bikes have mid-controls, but the Harley’s pegs are higher and create more of a bend in a taller rider’s knees—cornering clearance isn’t free. Indian’s tall-back seat has a more supportive foam and is all-day comfortable, whereas the Harley’s seat foam is so soft that you start to feel pressure points after an hour or two in the saddle. One of our test riders did identical six-hour rides over the course of a weekend and couldn’t wait for the ride to be done on the Harley due to that soft seat causing pressure points in areas where you don’t want pressure points. Those same six hours flew by on the Indian. How many Low Riders will stay stock for very long? Added comfort is just an aftermarket seat away, even if that incurs an additional cost that is not required on the Sport Chief.

Every person who rode the Sport Chief commented on how difficult that bike’s clutch was to use in around-town riding. Will you get used to it? Yes. Should you have to? No.Jeff Allen

Final Thoughts

Speaking of the aftermarket (and cruiser scene as a whole), we couldn’t think of a better place to end our test than at one of the most iconic custom and vintage motorcycle events in the States: the Born-Free Show. Bikes like these exist because of the culture that was built around shows like this, and shows like this exist because of the culture built around bikes like these.

Not surprisingly, considering Harley has been building and customizing bikes for a steadier period of time, not to mention working tirelessly to build a culture around its brand, there are more Bar & Shield bikes than anything else. Will the Sport Chief help Indian take a bigger piece of that pie, and more importantly, is it a better motorcycle than the Low Rider S? The short answer is no.

Nobody is going to confuse the Low Rider S for a sportbike, but it’s still a fun bike to let loose on in the twisties.Jeff Allen

The long answer is more complicated, because in some ways the Sport Chief is a better take on the West Coast–style performance cruiser. We appreciate the Indian’s more polished appearance, its punchy bottom-end, added comfort, and of course the look of those outboard shocks. But while we also enjoy the bike’s rawness, life has taught us that lust doesn’t hold a candle to love in the long run.

That is not to say you will immediately love the Low Rider S, but that the package is fewer tweaks away from being a really entertaining, capable, and comfortable bike that’s just as fun cruising up the coast as it is hustling down a canyon road. It handles better, the engine has better overall performance, and unlike the Indian, our testbike never suffered from small quirks like a slow-starting display. It is, quite simply, the best showroom-stock West Coast–style cruiser.

Testing break to have a little fun. Or maybe this is part of the testing? Either way, we made sure to let loose a little on both bikes. For what it’s worth, it’s much easier to break the tire loose on the grunty Sport Chief, but easier to wheelie the more rev-happy Low Rider S.Jeff Allen
The Low Rider S is easier to hustle through a section of tight corners thanks to its lower weight, shorter wheelbase, and narrower front tire (110/90-19 versus 130/60-19), not to mention a wider handlebar that offers more leverage.Jeff Allen
Despite the Indian’s taller bar riser, the shorter bar bend makes the reach to the controls closer than the Harley’s. This rider is 5 feet, 7 inches.Jeff Allen
The Low Rider S’ softer suspension still provides plenty of holdup in the canyons.Jeff Allen
The grass lot at the Born-Free Show is a sign of a cruiser market that’s still clearly dominated by Harley-Davidson. Will the Sport Chief bring more eyeballs to Indian? Only time will tell. What we can say is that Indian has done a mighty fine job building a bike that can go toe-to-toe with the Low Rider S, and definitely deserves a look.Jeff Allen
Low Rider S power and torque curves aren’t as peaky as the same lines on the Sport Chief chart. This translates to a more flexible engine that requires less shifting, especially when riding through the canyons.Robert Martin
Although the Sport Chief makes less peak power and torque than the Harley-Davidson, aggressive throttle tuning and a meaty bottom-end gives it a more exciting character than the Low Rider S off idle. Exhaust note is more full and overall better too.Robert Martin

Gearbox:

Helmet: Alpinestars Supertech R10

Jacket: Oscar by Alpinestars Brass Leather Jacket

Vest: Alpinestars Tech-Air 3 Canvas

Pant: Alpinestars Copper V3

Gloves: Alpinestars x Diesel Kei Leather Gloves

Boots: Alpinestars CR-6 Drystar Riding Shoe

Helmet: Arai Contour-X

Jacket: Alpinestars

Vest: Alpinestars Tech-Air 3 Canvas

Pant: Alpinestars Copper V2 Denim

Gloves: Alpinestars Chrome

Boots: Oscar by Alpinestars Monty

2024 Harley Davidson Low Rider S and Indian Sport Chief at Neptunes Nest
Is it really a cruise up PCH if you didn’t stop at Neptune’s Net?Jeff Allen

2024 Harley-Davidson Low Rider S Specs

MSRP:$19,999 ($20,649 as tested)
Engine:Oil/air-cooled Milwaukee-Eight 117 V-twin; 8 valves
Displacement:117ci (1,917cc)
Bore x Stroke:103.5 x 114.3mm
Compression Ratio:10.2:1
Transmission/Final Drive:6-speed/belt
Cycle World Measured Horsepower:93.0 hp @ 4,690 rpm
Cycle World Measured Torque:114.8 lb.-ft. @ 3,020 rpm
Fuel System:Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection
Clutch:Wet, multiplate
Frame:Steel tubular
Front Suspension:43mm inverted cartridge fork
Rear Suspension:Coilover shock, spring preload adjustable
Front Brake:4-piston caliper
Rear Brake:2-piston floating caliper
Wheels, Front/Rear:Radiate cast aluminum; 19 in./16 in.
Tires, Front/Rear:Michelin Scorcher 31; 110/90B-19 / 180/70B-16
Rake/Trail:28.0°/5.7 in.
Wheelbase:63.6 in.
Ground Clearance:5.7 in.
Seat Height:28.2 in.
Fuel Capacity:5.0 gal.
Cycle World Measured Wet Weight:678 lb.
Contact:harley-davidson.com

CW Measured Performance

Quarter-Mile:12.34 sec. @ 110.07 mph
0–30 mph:1.54 sec.
0–60 mph:3.72 sec.
0–100 mph:9.52 sec.
Braking, 30–0 mph:31.68 ft.
Braking, 60–0 mph:128.75 ft.

2024 Indian Sport Chief Specs

MSRP:$19,999 ($20,499 as tested)
Engine:Air-cooled Thunderstroke 116, 49° V-twin; 4 valves
Displacement:115.3ci (1,890cc)
Bore x Stroke:103.2 x 113.0mm
Compression Ratio:11.0:1
Transmission/Final Drive:6-speed/belt
Cycle World Measured Horsepower:73.7 hp @ 4,450 rpm
Cycle World Measured Torque:105.2 lb.-ft. @ 2,410 rpm
Fuel Delivery:Closed-loop fuel injection w/ 54mm throttle bodies
Clutch:Wet, multiplate
Engine Management:Ride-by-wire
Frame:Steel tube w/ cast aluminum rear subframe
Front Suspension:43mm KYB inverted telescopic fork; 5.1 in. travel
Rear Suspension:Dual Fox shocks w/ piggyback reservoirs, spring preload adjustable; 4.0 in. travel
Front Brake:Dual Brembo 4-piston radial-mount calipers, semi-floating dual 320mm discs w/ ABS
Rear Brake:2-piston caliper, 300mm floating disc w/ ABS
Wheels, Front/Rear:Cast; 19 x 3.5 in. / 16 x 5.0 in.
Tires, Front/Rear:Pirelli Night Dragon; 130/60B-19 / 180/65B-16
Rake/Trail:28.0°/4.4 in.
Wheelbase:64.6 in.
Ground Clearance:5.9 in.
Seat Height:27.0 in.
Fuel Capacity:4.0 gal.
Cycle World Measured Wet Weight:687 lb.
Contact:indianmotorcycle.com

CW Measured Performance

Quarter-Mile:13.33 sec. @ 102.64 mph
0–30 mph:1.88 sec.
0–60 mph:4.55 sec.
0–100 mph:12.38 sec.
Braking, 30–0 mph:37.40 ft.
Braking, 60–0 mph:148.50 ft.
0.00 avg. rating (0% score) - 0 votes